Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of alcohol on sacculocollic and vestibulo-ocular reflex systems, when the breath alcohol concentration (BrAC) is close to the legal limit of 0.25 mg/l. Twenty healthy male volunteers underwent vestibular evoked myogenic potential and caloric coupled with visual suppression tests. These tests were conducted prior to imbibing alcohol at a dosage of 0.5 g/kg to achieve a peak BrAC of around 0.25 mg/l. Once the peak BrAC was reached, these tests were performed again. Predosing and postdosing analytical results were compared, as were those with BrAC levels > or = 0.25 mg/l and <0.25 mg/l. After ingesting alcohol, 36 ears (90%) showed vestibular evoked myogenic potential responses, with a significantly increased latency of peak p13. The mean slow-phase velocity of caloric nystagmus in 40 ears after dosing was significantly reduced, and that with BrAC > or =0.25 mg/l was significantly less than that with BrAC <0.25 mg/l. Likewise, the visual suppression index decreased considerably after alcohol ingestion. In conclusion, from the perspective of vestibular function, the 0.25-mg/l BrAC limit gains clinical significance, because the vestibulo-ocular reflex performance deteriorates further, when the BrAC exceeds 0.25 mg/l. However, impaired performance of sacculocollic reflex and vestibulocerebellar interaction has occurred, when the BrAC was <0.25 mg/l, suggesting that a lower legal threshold is appropriate.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Chiang et al. (2007) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: