Despite active immune responses, gammaherpesviruses establish latency. In a related process, these viruses also persistently replicate by using a mechanism that requires different viral genes than acute-phase replication. Many questions remain about the role of immunity in chronic gammaherpesvirus infection, including whether the immune system controls latency by regulating latent cell numbers and/or other properties and what specific immune mediators control latency and persistent replication. We show here that CD8(+) T cells regulate both latency and persistent replication and demonstrate for the first time that CD8(+) T cells regulate both the number of latently infected cells and the efficiency with which infected cells reactivate from latency. Furthermore, we show that gamma interferon (IFN-gamma) and perforin, which play no significant role during acute infection, are essential for immune control of latency and persistent replication. Surprisingly, the effects of perforin and IFN-gamma are site specific, with IFN-gamma being important in peritoneal cells while perforin is important in the spleen. Studies of the mechanisms of action of IFN-gamma and perforin revealed that perforin acts primarily by controlling the number of latently infected cells while IFN-gamma acts primarily by controlling reactivation efficiency. The immune system therefore controls chronic gammaherpesvirus infection by site-specific mechanisms that regulate both the number and reactivation phenotype of latently infected cells.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tibbetts et al. (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: