Key result
Historical developments in recording techniques for precordial motion highlight the need for a more scientific analysis of the cardiac impulse by palpation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Highlights the historical context and need for scientific analysis of precordial motion in physical cardiac diagnosis.
PHYSICAL diagnosis of the heart has im- proved considerably as a result of the availability of recording technics that enable the observer to check the physical signs with an instrumental record and thus to edu- cate himself. This technic has been particularly successful in the application of phonocardiography to auscultation, but the analysis of the cardiac impulse by palpation has lagged be- hind. The information to be gained by palpation was recognized by James Hope' in his classic text of 1839, and the first attempt at recording precordial motion was made by Chauveau and Marey in 1861,2 using a pres- sure sensitive capsule. Later pioneers in this field include Frank,3 Mackenzie,4 Wiggers,5 and Dressler.6 Renewed interest has followed the development of electronic sensing technics and the opportunity to correlate the record with events observed at cardiac catheteriza- tion. A number of investigators7-19 have made important contributions; outstanding among these is the work of Hartman and his col- leagues in the Netherlands.20 21 It is hoped that a more scientific analysis and description of precordial motion will result, in place of the "thrust, heave and tap" to be found in most standard textbooks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Craige et al. (1965) conducted a review in Normal Children. Recording techniques for precordial motion was evaluated. Historical developments in recording techniques for precordial motion highlight the need for a more scientific analysis of the cardiac impulse by palpation.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: