Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reaction of trineopentylaluminum, Np3Al (Np = Me3CCH2-), with 1,2-diphenylhydrazine, Ph(H)N-N(H)Ph, or elemental sulfur in toluene affords the dimeric crystalline products [Np2Al-N(H)Ph]2, I, and [Np2Al-SNp]2, II, respectively. The etherate of triphenylalumium, Ph3Al·OEt2, when allowed to react with 2-aminobiphenyl, yields the dimer [Ph2AL-N(H[Ph′]2, (Ph′ = Biphenyl) III. Each compound has been characterized by 1H NMR, elemental analysis, and single crystal X-ray diffraction. I and II crystallize in the monoclinic space group P21/n (No. 14); I: a = 9.801 (3), b = 20.490 (9), c = 17.569 (8) Å, β = 97.81 (3)°, V = 3496 (3) Å3 for Z = 4; II: a = 10.191 (5) Å, b = 10.907 (5) Å, c = 16.779 (6) Å, β = 97.18 (3)°, V = 1851 (1) Å8 for Z = 2. Refinement of I converged at R = 0.051, R w = 0.049, while refinement of II converged at R = 0.051, R w = 0.066. III crystallizes in the tetragonal space group l41/a (No. 88); a = 26.628 (5) Å, c = 11.017 (4) Å, V = 7812 (4) Å3, for Z = 8. Refinement of III converged at R = 0.065, R w = 0.058. All compounds reside about planar Al2Z2 (Z = N, S) four-membered rings with Al-N bond distances ranging from 1.978 (8) to 1.992 (8) Å for I, Al-S distances ranging from 2.353 (2) to 2.364 (2) Å for II, and Al-N distances of 1.983 (7) and 1.946 (6) Å for III. Further pyrolysis of these products did not yield higher oligomers.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Dillingham et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: