Why the study?
Cardiac amyloidosis is a rarely reported and potentially fatal variant of systemic disease whose early diagnosis could significantly improve clinical outcomes.
Case Report (n=1)
No
Early suspicion and multimodality imaging, particularly CMRI, are crucial for the timely diagnosis and management of rapidly progressing cardiac amyloidosis.
Supports CMRI consideration in suspected cardiac amyloidosis; hypothesis-generating and should not change practice.
INTRODUCTION: Cardiac amyloidosis is a rarely reported and potentially fatal variant of the systemic disease. Its early diagnosis could potentially lead to significantly improved clinical outcomes. CASE PRESENTATION: A 56-year-old female presented with dyspnea and palpitations. Her physical exam and non-invasive evaluation with cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMRI) revealed restrictive cardiomyopathy, and the bone marrow biopsy results showed systemic amyloidosis. DISCUSSION: The diagnosis of cardiac amyloidosis is not always straightforward, and delay can cause the progression of the disease and an increased risk of morbidity and mortality. Electrocardiograms, echocardiograms, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging, and histopathologic evaluation are the main methods for diagnosing cardiac amyloidosis. The treatment consists of controlling heart failure symptoms and disease-modifying interventions, including medical and surgical therapeutic methods. CLINICAL LEARNING POINT (CONCLUSION): Cardiac involvement is the main cause of death in systemic amyloidosis. Early suspicion, diagnosis, and treatment are crucial in improving patients' survival. CMRI can play an essential role in the diagnosis of cardiac Amyloidosis. A graphical abstract is provided for visual summary.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Senobari et al. (2024) conducted a case report in Cardiac amyloidosis (n=1). Diagnostic evaluation and symptom management (Furosemide) was evaluated on Clinical condition and symptom severity.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: