Response of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Merlot to Low Frequency Irrigation and Partial Root Zone Drying in the Western Cape Coastal Region – Part II. Vegetative Growth, Yield and Quality

The impact of five drip irrigation strategies on vegetative growth, yield and quality of Merlot/99R was comparedto a non-irrigated control (T1) in the coastal region of the Western Cape province. Irrigations at pea size,véraison and post-harvest, either applied in grapevine rows (T2) or work rows (T4), tended to increase berrymass and yield compared to T1. More frequent irrigation at pea size, midway between pea size and véraison,at véraison, midway between véraison and harvest, and post-harvest, applied either in the grapevine rows (T3)or work rows (T5), increased berry mass and yield. A partial root zone drying (PRD) strategy, obtained byswitching subsurface irrigation in the work rows between alternating rows at approximately 14-day intervals(T6), induced a similar trend. Under the given conditions, yield only increased when irrigation plus rainfallfrom bud break in September until harvest in February/March increased from ca. 200 mm to 400 mm. Morewater did not cause any further yield increases. Although low frequency irrigation increased yields comparedto T1, it did not affect sensorial wine quality characteristics negatively. Non-irrigated grapevines producedthe smallest berries, but did not necessarily produce wine superior in quality. The PRD strategy reduced winequality, particularly when irrigation was applied at a high frequency between switches. The latter strategy onlyimproved irrigation water productivity when compared to conventionally irrigated grapevines that receivedunnecessary high volumes of water. Subsurface irrigation applied in the work rows did not affect grapevineresponses compared to irrigation in the grapevine rows.