Key result
Sewage monitoring mainly detected Coxsackie B viruses (84.0%), whereas ECHO viruses (75.6%) dominated in enteroviral meningitis, indicating low informative value of sewage studies.
Observational
Screening children for non-polio enteroviruses is more informative than sewage testing for forecasting enteroviral meningitis epidemics.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Sewage monitoring may poorly predict enteroviral meningitis etiology; leaves open whether pediatric screening better forecasts epidemics.
This work evaluates the results of long-term dynamic monitoring of non-polio enteroviruses (NPEV) circulation in the indicator subpopulation in Yekaterinburg (children aged 3 to 6 years old), isolation of this group of viruses from specimens of sewage and the spectrum of causative agents detected in the liquor of patients with enteroviral meningitis (EVM). We established a high comparability rate of Coxsackie B and ECHO virus serotypes etiologically significant in EVM and isolated from healthy carriers. NPEV detected in sewage waters over the observation period were presented mainly by Coxsackie B viruses (84.0 %), while ECHO viruses (75.6 %) dominated among the causative agents of EVM. A conclusion was made about low informative value of the sewage study results for evaluation and forecast of the EVM epidemic situation as well as about the rationale for including the screening studies of NPEV circulation in the indicator subpopulation into the system of virological and molecular genetic monitoring.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Акимкин et al. (2020) conducted an observational in Enteroviral meningitis. Monitoring of non-polio enteroviruses (NPEV) in sewage and indicator subpopulations was evaluated on Spectrum of causative agents detected in sewage vs enteroviral meningitis patients. Sewage monitoring mainly detected Coxsackie B viruses (84.0%), whereas ECHO viruses (75.6%) dominated in enteroviral meningitis, indicating low informative value of sewage studies.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: