Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Molecular recognition between peptides and metal oxide surfaces is a fundamental process in biomineralization, self-assembly, and biocompatibility. Yet, the underlying driving forces and dominant mechanisms remain unclear, bringing obstacles to understand and control this process. To elucidate the mechanism of peptide/surface recognition, specifically the role of serine phosphorylation, we employed molecular dynamics simulation and metadynamics-enhanced sampling to study five artificial peptides, DDD, DSS, DpSpS, DpSpSGKK, and DpSKGpSK, interacting with two surfaces: rutile TiO 2 and quartz SiO 2 . On both surfaces, we observe that phosphorylation increases the binding energy. However, the interfacial peptide conformation reveals a distinct binding mechanism on each surface. We also study the impact of peptide sequence to binding free energy and interfacial conformation on both surfaces, specifically the impact on the behavior of phosphorylated serine. Finally, the results are discussed in context of prior studies investigating the role of serine phosphorylation in peptide binding to silica.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mao et al. (2019) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: