Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aim: This paper aims to report comprehensive, evidence-based guidelines for screening and diagnosing Internet Use Disorders (IUDs), including subtypes such as Gaming Disorder, Social Network Use Disorder, Pornography Use Disorder, and Shopping Disorder. Methods: Guidelines are derived from a review of the literature up to November 2021 and expert consensus. Diagnostic tools are assessed against 11 quality criteria, including adherence to ICD-11 and DSM-5 criteria, psychometric robustness, and clinical applicability. The recommendations focus on validated questionnaires for screening and structured clinical interviews for confirmatory diagnoses. Results: The guideline proposes ten key recommendations. For general IUD screening, tools such as the CIUS, OSV-S/AICA-S, and ACSID-11 are recommended. Specific tools for subtypes include the IGDS9-SF and GDT for Gaming Disorder (CSAS and GADIS for children and adolescents), SMDS/SOMEDIS for Social Network Use Disorder, BPS and PPCS-6 for Pornography Use Disorder, and PBS and COSS for Shopping Disorder. Structured clinical interviews, including the AICA-SKI-IBS and I-CAT, are recommended for definitive diagnoses. Conclusions: This is the first guideline to address screening and diagnosis of IUDs. As some recommendations are based on a limited level of evidence, future updates should incorporate scientific advancements to enhance its clinical utility and relevance
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Rehbein et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: