Key result
A high dynamic component of sport was associated with type 2 ECG abnormalities using ESC (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.28-4.33) and Seattle criteria, but not when using the Refined Criteria.
Why the study?
Does the use of Refined Criteria compared to ESC and Seattle criteria alter the classification of ECG abnormalities in screening athletes?
Cross-Sectional (n=1,030)
Does the use of Refined Criteria compared to ESC and Seattle criteria alter the classification of ECG abnormalities in screening athletes?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The Refined Criteria for athlete ECG screening reduces the prevalence of type 2 (abnormal) findings compared to ESC and Seattle criteria, and removes the association between high dynamic sport components and type 2 abnormalities.
To interpret the electrocardiogram (ECG) of athletes, the recommendations of the ESC and the Seattle criteria define type 1 peculiarities, those induced by training, and type 2, those not induced by training, to rule out cardiomyopathy. The specificity of the screening was improved by Sheikh who defined "Refined Criteria," which includes a group of intermediate peculiarities. The aim of our study was to investigate the influence of static and dynamic components on the prevalence of different types of abnormalities. The ECGs of 1030 athletes performed during preparticipation screening were interpreted using these three classifications. Our work revealed 62/16%, 69/13%, and 71/7% of type 1 peculiarities and type 2 abnormalities for the ESC, Seattle, and Refined Criteria algorithms, respectively(P<.001). For type 2 abnormalities, three independent factors were found for the ESC and Seattle criteria: age, Afro-Caribbean origin, and the dynamic component with, for the latter, an OR[95% CI] of 2.35[1.28-4.33] (P=.006) and 1.90[1.03-3.51] (P=.041), respectively. In contrast, only the Afro-Caribbean origin was associated with type 2 abnormalities using the Refined Criteria: OR[95% CI] 2.67[1.60-4.46] (P<.0001). The Refined Criteria classified more athletes in the type 1 category and fewer in the type 2 category compared with the ESC and Seattle algorithms. Contrary to previous studies, a high dynamic component was not associated with type 2 abnormalities when the Refined Criteria were used; only the Afro-Caribbean origin remained associated. Further research is necessary to better understand adaptations with regard to duration and thus improve the modern criteria for ECG screening in athletes.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maillot et al. (2017) conducted a cross-sectional in Athletes undergoing preparticipation screening (n=1,030). Dynamic component of sport was evaluated on Type 2 ECG abnormalities (ESC criteria) (OR 2.35, 95% CI 1.28-4.33, p=0.006). A high dynamic component of sport was associated with type 2 ECG abnormalities using ESC (OR 2.35; 95% CI 1.28-4.33) and Seattle criteria, but not when using the Refined Criteria.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: