This report describes a biological screening system to measure the antioxidant capacity of compounds using the oxidant-induced growth arrest response of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Alternative methods using the nonphysiological free radical compounds such as diphenylpicrylhydrazyl and azinobis ethylbenzothiaziline-6-sulphonate (ABTS) only provide an indication of the ability of a compound to scavenge oxidants. In contrast, this yeast-based method can also measure the ability of a compound to induce cellular resistance to the damaging effects of oxidants. The screening assay was established against a panel of six physiologically relevant oxidants ranging from reactive oxygen species (hydrogen peroxide, cumene peroxide, linoleic acid hydroperoxide), to a superoxide-generating agent (menadione), reactive nitrogen species (peroxynitrite) and a thiol-oxidizing agent (diamide). The antioxidants ascorbate and gallic acid displayed scavenging activity and induced the resistance of cells against a broad range of oxidants using this assay. Lipoic acid, which showed no scavenging activity and thus would not be detected as an antioxidant using a nonphysiological screen was, however, identified in this assay as providing resistance to cells against a range of oxidants. This assay is high throughput, in the format of a 96-well microtitre plate, and will greatly facilitate the search for effective antioxidants.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wu et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: