Key result
The direct total cavopulmonary connection procedure demonstrated similar peak VO2 (20.29 vs 19.10 mL/min/kg; p=0.5939) and cardiac output compared to the standard extracardiac conduit procedure.
Why the study?
This study aimed to compare long-term outcomes and quality of survival between the direct total cavopulmonary connection procedure and the standard extracardiac conduit procedure in Fontan patients.
Does the direct total cavopulmonary connection (dTCPC) procedure improve long-term outcomes and quality of survival compared to the standard extracardiac conduit (ECC) procedure in Fontan patients?
Cross-Sectional (n=31)
No
Does the direct total cavopulmonary connection (dTCPC) procedure improve long-term outcomes and quality of survival compared to the standard extracardiac conduit (ECC) procedure in Fontan patients?
Absolute Event Rate: 20.29% vs 19.1%
p-value: p=0.5939
The direct total cavopulmonary connection procedure demonstrates similar long-term cardiopulmonary function, blood flow, and metabolic profiles compared to the standard extracardiac conduit in Fontan patients.
Similar cardiopulmonary metrics with dTCPC versus ECC; leaves open differential survival effects in Fontan patients.
Background: This study aims to compare the long-term outcomes and quality of survival between the direct total cavopulmonary connection (dTCPC) procedure and the standard extracardiac conduit (ECC) procedure in Fontan patients. Methods: A total of 31 participants who underwent the Fontan operation with either ECC (n = 15) or dTCPC (n = 16) at our institution were recruited between May 2023 and October 2023. Comprehensive evaluations included physical examinations, blood tests, targeted plasma metabolomics assays, cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET), and cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). Data collected from these assessments were analyzed and compared between the two groups. Results: The mean follow-up duration was longer in the dTCPC group (174.25 ± 63.06 months) compared to the ECC group (144.00 ± 43.70 months). No significant differences were observed in blood test parameters between the groups (p > 0.05). During CPET, two patients in the dTCPC group (12.5%) terminated the experiment due to a sudden decrease in exercise tolerance during the cycling process. Peak VO2 values were comparable between groups, with 20.29 ± 7.40 mL/min/kg in the dTCPC group versus 19.10 ± 7.93 mL/min/kg in the ECC group (p = 0.5939). Cardiac output in CMR revealed no significant differences between the two groups (5.28 ± 3.20 vs. 5.40 ± 2.85, p > 0.05). Additionally, flow measurements within the Fontan structure showed no significant differences (2.042 ± 1.0 vs. 2.023 ± 1.0], p > 0.05). Plasma metabolic profiling using targeted metabolomics demonstrated that the metabolic profiles of the two groups were broadly similar. Conclusions: The dTCPC procedure demonstrated similar outcomes to the ECC procedure in terms of exercise cardiopulmonary function, blood flow in central great vessels and plasma metabolic profiles. However, the long-term survival quality following dTCPC surgery, particularly regarding exercise capacity, may not fully meet expectations, highlighting the need for further refinement in surgical techniques and postoperative management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wang et al. (2024) conducted a cross-sectional in Fontan Circulation (n=31). Direct total cavopulmonary connection (dTCPC) vs. Standard extracardiac conduit (ECC) procedure was evaluated on Peak VO2 (mL/min/kg) (p=0.5939). The direct total cavopulmonary connection procedure demonstrated similar peak VO2 (20.29 vs 19.10 mL/min/kg; p=0.5939) and cardiac output compared to the standard extracardiac conduit procedure.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: