Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The identification of factors related to PMS is still general in nature and has not focused on identifying risk factor related the type of PMS. PMS itself is more experienced by women of childbearing age. The prevalence of PMS types in women of childbearing age is done to be able to map the types of PMS so that their magnitude can be found in the population. This research is a descriptive analytic study with a cross sectional approach. The population in this study were women of childbearing age (15-49 years) who were in the west Purwokerto subdistrict and Sumbang subdistrict. The number of samples in this study were 101 respondents. The sampling technique was purposive sampling. Collect data using interviews with respondents. Data analysis used binomial test and multinomial regression. The results of the study can be explained that there are differences in the proportion of PMS A, H and D types in the population. There is a difference in the proportion between Type H, PMS C, Type A and Type D depending on the length of time using contraceptive and stress level.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sistiarani et al. (2023) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: