Key result
Pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty both led to significant right ventricular reverse remodelling, with 5-year survival rates of 96% and 79%, respectively (p=0.25).
Why the study?
Pulmonary endarterectomy is the treatment of choice for CTEPH and balloon pulmonary angioplasty is an alternative for inoperable patients, but comparisons of right ventricular remodelling and late survival between them were needed.
Does pulmonary endarterectomy compared to balloon pulmonary angioplasty improve right ventricular remodelling and long-term survival in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
Cohort (n=98)
Does pulmonary endarterectomy compared to balloon pulmonary angioplasty improve right ventricular remodelling and long-term survival in patients with chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension?
Absolute Event Rate: 96% vs 79%
p-value: p=0.25
Both pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty lead to significant right ventricular reverse remodelling in CTEPH patients, with improvement in RV fractional area change independently predicting survival.
No significant survival difference seen between PEA and BPA; leaves open optimal strategy in CTEPH pending randomized trials.
BACKGROUND: Pulmonary endarterectomy (PEA) is the treatment of choice for chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH), while balloon pulmonary angioplasty (BPA) is an alternative for inoperable patients. We aimed to compare right ventricular (RV) remodelling and late survival after PEA and BPA. METHODS: In this prospective observational cohort study, we performed echocardiography at baseline and follow-up in patients with CTEPH treated with PEA (n=54) or BPA (n=44) between 2011 and 2022. RESULTS: Follow-up echocardiography was performed at 5 months (IQR 4-7) after PEA and 3 months (IQR 2-4) after the last BPA. Both groups showed significant improvements in left ventricular end-systolic eccentricity index, RV basal diameter and RV fractional area change (RV FAC). Tricuspid regurgitation pressure decreased by 26±18 mm Hg after PEA and 13±21 mm Hg after BPA (p=0.02 for between-group difference). Tricuspid annular systolic excursion (TAPSE) decreased by 4±5 mm after PEA but increased by 1±4 mm after BPA (p<0.001). The TAPSE/systolic pulmonary artery pressure ratio improved similarly in both groups. Five-year survival was 96% (95% CI 86% to 99%) for PEA and 79% (95% CI 61% to 89%) for BPA (p=0.25). Change in RV FAC was an independent predictor of survival (HR 0.9, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.99, p=0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Both PEA and BPA led to significant RV reverse remodelling, with no clear evidence of a difference in survival rates. Improvement in RV function, particularly RV FAC, was associated with better outcomes, highlighting the importance of RV recovery in CTEPH treatment.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ravnestad et al. (2024) conducted a cohort in chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (n=98). Pulmonary endarterectomy vs. Balloon pulmonary angioplasty was evaluated on 5-year survival (p=0.25). Pulmonary endarterectomy and balloon pulmonary angioplasty both led to significant right ventricular reverse remodelling, with 5-year survival rates of 96% and 79%, respectively (p=0.25).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: