Key result
The CVB5 VLPs vaccine conferred 100% protection to CVB5-challenged suckling mice via passive immunity, compared to 80% protection with the inactivated vaccine.
Why the study?
Coxsackievirus B5 is a major pathogen causing conditions like hand, foot and mouth disease and aseptic meningitis, but no specific drugs or vaccines are available.
Does a CVB5 VLP vaccine improve immunogenicity and immunoprotection compared to an inactivated vaccine in mice?
Does a CVB5 VLP vaccine improve immunogenicity and immunoprotection compared to an inactivated vaccine in mice?
A novel CVB5 virus-like particle vaccine demonstrates superior immunogenicity and protection against CVB5 challenge in mice compared to an inactivated vaccine.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
VLPs merit prioritization in CVB5 vaccine research; leaves open clinical translation and human trials.
Coxsackievirus B group 5 (CVB5) represents one of the major pathogens that cause diseases such as hand, foot and mouth disease (HFMD) and aseptic meningitis et al. Currently, no specific drugs and vaccines are available, and a safe and effective CVB5 vaccine is of great value for control of the diseases. In this study, CVB5 P1 precursor and 3CD protease were co-expressed in Sf9 cells by using a baculovirus expression system. The P1 was processed by 3CD and self-assembled into CVB5 virus-like particles (VLPs). VP1 and VP3 capsid proteins of CVB5 could be detected by SDS-PAGE and Western blotting. Transmission electron microscopy revealed that the CVB5 VLPs were spherical particles with a diameter of about 30 nm, mimicking wild-type CVB5 virus. Our study showed that the total IgG and neutralizing antibodies induced by CVB5 VLPs were higher than those induced by inactivated vaccine. More importantly, the CVB5 VLPs conferred full protection to the CVB5-challenged suckling mice via passive immunity while protection efficiency of the inactivated vaccine was only 80%. The CVB5 VLPs vaccine could protect the limb muscles, brain, and heart tissues of suckling mice from CVB5-induced damage. These results demonstrated that the CVB5 VLPs vaccine possessed stronger immunogenicity and provided more robust immunoprotection than the inactivated CVB5 vaccine, suggesting that the CVB5 VLPs promise to be a CVB5 vaccine candidate in future.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2021) studied Coxsackievirus B5 infection. CVB5 virus-like particles (VLPs) vaccine vs. Inactivated CVB5 vaccine was evaluated on Protection efficiency to CVB5-challenged suckling mice via passive immunity. The CVB5 VLPs vaccine conferred 100% protection to CVB5-challenged suckling mice via passive immunity, compared to 80% protection with the inactivated vaccine.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: