Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
OBJECTIVE: To compare the antipyretic efficacy of an initial 30-mg/kg acetaminophen loading dose versus a 15-mg/kg maintenance dose. METHODS: A double-blind, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial was conducted. A total of 121 febrile (rectal temperature between 39 degrees C and 40 degrees C) but otherwise healthy outpatients who were 4 months to 9 years of age and weighed 4 to 26 kg were assigned randomly to 1 of the dose groups: 15 mg/kg (n = 62) and 30 mg/kg (n = 59). RESULTS: In an "intention to treat" analysis, the time to obtain a temperature lower than 38.5 degrees C was significantly shorter in the 30-mg/kg than in the 15-mg/kg group (110 +/- 94 minutes vs 139 +/- 113 minutes). The maximum temperature decrease was significantly higher in the 30-mg/kg than in the 15-mg/kg group (2.3 +/- 0.7 degrees C vs 1.7 +/- 0.6 degrees C). Duration of rectal temperature below 38.5 degrees C was significantly longer in the 30-mg/kg than in the 15-mg/kg group (250 +/- 92 minutes vs 185 +/- 121 minutes, respectively). Adverse events were reported in 6 children in the 30-mg/kg group compared with 5 in the 15-mg/kg group (hyperthermia, hypothermia, vomiting). The difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: An initial 30-mg/kg acetaminophen loading dose seemed to be more effective in reducing fever than a 15-mg/kg maintenance dose. No difference was observed regarding clinical tolerance. These data suggest that acetaminophen treatment of fever may be more efficient in an initial loading dose.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tréluyer et al. (2001) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: