Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
November 12, 2007American Journal of Medical Genetics Part A

Does single umbilical artery (SUA) predict any type of congenital defect? Clinical–epidemiological analysis of a large consecutive series of malformed infants

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

MMMaría Luisa Martínez‐FríasInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIEBEva BermejoInstituto de Salud Carlos IIIERElvira Rodríguez‐PinillaInstituto de Salud Carlos III

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Martínez‐Frías et al. (2007) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a92eb3eb0c78f018b01c981https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.31911
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Single umbilical artery at 11–14 weeks' gestation: relation to chromosomal defects2003 · 82 citations
  2. 2Vascular Steal: The Pathogenetic Mechanism Producing Sirenomelia and Associated Defects of the Viscera and Soft Tissues1986 · 254 citations
  3. 3Antenatal Diagnosis of Single Umbilical Artery2002 · 32 citations
  4. 4A Comparative Efficacy Trial in Germany in Infants Who Received Either the Lederle/Takeda Acellular Pertussis Component DTP (DTaP) Vaccine, the Lederle Whole-Cell Component DTP Vaccine, or DT Vaccine1998 · 513 citations
  5. 5Exstrophy of the cloaca and exstrophy of the bladder: Two different expressions of a primary developmental field defect2001 · 151 citations