⌘+K

Pulse Explore Communities Researchers Journals

Home Communities Explore

March 13, 2010The American Journal of Bioethics

Disentangling Methodologies: The Ethics of Traditional Sampling Methodologies, Community-Based Participatory Research, and Respondent-Driven Sampling

Melissa L. Constantine

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Abstract

Simon and Mosavel (2010) provide no contextual basis for evaluation or ethical analysis of respondent-driven sampling (RDS). In their article, “Community Members as Recruiters of Human Subjects: Et...

Discussion

No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.

Cite This Study

Melissa L. Constantine (2010) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/6a92ec2e43a54892498c9b85 https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160903585628

View at Publisher

Ask AI

Bookmark

Share

Keep reading

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

1Estimating the Effect of Incentives on Mail Survey Response Rates: A Meta-AnalysisMeta-Analysis · 1993 · 704 citations
27. Respondent-Driven Sampling: An Assessment of Current MethodologyOriginal Research · 2010 · 613 citations
3Respondent-Driven Sampling II: Deriving Valid Population Estimates from Chain-Referral Samples of Hidden PopulationsOriginal Research · 2002 · 1,877 citations
45. Sampling and Estimation in Hidden Populations Using Respondent-Driven SamplingOriginal Research · 2004 · 1,955 citations
5Community Members as Recruiters of Human Subjects: Ethical ConsiderationsOriginal Research · 2010 · 75 citations

More related papers

Differential Incentives: Beliefs about Practices, Perceptions of Equity, and Effects on Survey Participation1999

More from The American Journal of Bioethics

Severity at the Gates: Or Why Prevention is the Aim of Reproductive Genetic Carrier ScreeningFri,
Federation Opacity Makes Medical Machine Learning’s Failures Harder to Detect and CorrectMon,
Organizational Trustworthiness: A Commitment AccountMon,
Non-Anthropocentric Research Ethics? A Reply to the CommentariesMon,