Why the study?
Does continuous maintenance therapy improve outcomes compared to intermittent targeted therapy in patients with schizophrenia?
Does continuous maintenance therapy improve outcomes compared to intermittent targeted therapy in patients with schizophrenia?
The rationale for continuous maintenance antipsychotic pharmacotherapy in schizophrenia is not adequately validated, suggesting intermittent targeted treatment may warrant further evaluation.
Equivocal evidence cautions against assuming continuous maintenance superiority in schizophrenia; leaves open rigorous trials of intermittent targeted therapy.
The paper's aim was to evaluate a rationale for maintenance therapy in schizophrenia and to consider the feasibility of intermittent targeted therapy as an alternative treatment strategy. This was achieved by a selected review of the relevant English-language literature published since 1966 through a Medline search and cross-referencing. Current scientific evidence for continuous maintenance therapy in schizophrenia was found equivocal as the randomization in clinical trials lumped together heterogeneous groups of patients, thereby creating a wide gap between research and clinical practice. In addition, the majority of studies took a narrow view of the concept of relapse. For these reasons, targeted intermittent treatment was probably prematurely discarded altogether. The rationale for use and optimal duration of maintenance antipsychotic pharmacotherapy for schizophrenia has not been adequately validated. The construct validity of outcome indicators currently used in maintenance treatment studies in schizophrenia should be reconsidered. Intermittent targeted treatment may represent a viable option in some clinical situations and warrant further evaluation. With the widespread use of atypical antipsychotics, current long-term maintenance strategies may need a reappraisal.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sandra Sau Man Chan (2002) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: