PURPOSE: To compare the effects of mechanical versus alcohol-assisted epithelial debridement on corneal cellular elements after photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) using confocal microscopy. METHODS: This randomized, clinical trial included 66 eyes from 33 patients with spherical equivalent refraction <-4.00 diopters (D). Mechanical versus alcohol-assisted epithelial debridement was performed during PRK. The right eye of each patient was randomly assigned to one group (mechanical group or alcohol-assisted group) and the fellow eye to the alternate group. Confocal examination was performed preoperatively and at 3 and 6 months postoperatively. Main outcome measures were keratocyte density and maximum anterior stromal light reflectivity. RESULTS: Mean epithelial healing time was 3.2 ± 0.4 and 3.0 ± 0.3 days in the mechanical and alcohol-assisted groups, respectively (P=.001). Anterior retroablation stromal keratocyte density was 704.3 ± 119.9 cells/mm² and 734.3 ± 103.7 cells/mm² at 3 months (P=.05) and 643.8 ± 134.4 cells/mm² and 696.7 ± 129.6 cells/mm² at 6 months (P=.02) in the mechanical and alcohol-assisted groups, respectively. No significant difference was noted in midstromal and posterior keratocyte density between the two groups. Maximum reflectivity was 61.56 ± 12.64 international units (IU) and 56.93 ± 7.86 IU in the mechanical and alcohol-assisted groups, respectively, 3 months after surgery (P=.018). Corresponding values were 49.46 ± 4.97 IU and 48.98 ± 4.60 IU, respectively, 6 months after surgery (P=.628). CONCLUSIONS: Due to more adverse effects of mechanical epithelial debridement on anterior keratocyte density and anterior stromal reflectivity, alcohol-assisted epithelial debridement is recommended as the procedure of choice for epithelial removal during PRK in patients with mild myopia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Einollahi et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: