Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
While azulenic retinal analogs failed to yield a red-shifted visual pigment analog, the 9-cis isomers of the push-pull polyenals 3-methoxy-3-dehydroretinal and 14F-3-methoxy-3-dehydroretinal yielded iodopsin pigment analogs with absorption maxima at, respectively, 663 and 720 nm. The former gave a relatively stable batho product (700 nm) and was able to activate transducin. A lower activity was observed for the latter. One possible explanation for the combined results is that the excitation energies of these red-shifted pigments are approaching the threshold energy for visual transduction (although at this time we cannot rigorously exclude a role of the added F-atom in reducing the transducin activity).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Imai et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: