Key result
The Charlson Comorbidity Index independently predicted in-hospital mortality (OR 1.865; 95% CI 1.117-3.116; p=0.017) among patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
Why the study?
Despite the long-standing use of the Charlson Comorbidity Index, research on its application in cardiac surgery patients is limited.
Do the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) predict in-hospital mortality and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing isolated CABG?
Observational (n=393)
Do the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) predict in-hospital mortality and postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing isolated CABG?
Odds Ratio: 1.865 (95% CI 1.117–3.116)
p-value: p=0.017
Both CCI and ACCI are effective prognostic indicators for predicting in-hospital mortality and postoperative complications in patients undergoing isolated CABG.
May refine CABG mortality risk stratification; leaves open incremental value over existing scores in prospective studies.
Background/Objectives: The Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) is designed for evaluating comorbidities and mortality risks, with the age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) combining age and comorbidity assessments. Despite its long-standing use, research on CCI’s application in cardiac surgery patients is limited. This study assessed the effectiveness of CCI and ACCI in predicting in-hospital mortality and post-surgery outcomes for patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). Methods: CCI and ACCI scores were derived from medical records between 2016 and 2022. Patient demographics, surgical techniques, and postoperative complications were documented. Results: Totally 393 patients [297 (75.6%) males, 96 (24.4%) females] with an average age of 65 years were included. Median CCI and ACCI scores were 1 (1–2) and 4 (3–5), respectively. In-hospital mortality occurred in 5.9% (n = 23) of cases, with CCI being an independent predictor (OR 1.865, 95% CI 1.117–3.116; p = 0.017). Both CCI and ACCI scores negatively correlated with preoperative EF (%) and positively correlated with ICU and total hospital stay, cardiopulmonary bypass time, and cross-clamp time. ACCI score also positively correlated with extubation time. Patients categorized by CCI comorbidity severity (no comorbidity, mild, moderate, severe) showed a significant increase in postoperative complications with increasing severity, including postoperative VT (p = 0.000), acute renal failure (p = 0.009), pneumonia (p = 0.007), and in-hospital mortality (p = 0.001). Conclusions: Both CCI and ACCI are prognostic indicators for in-hospital mortality in isolated CABG surgery patients, effectively predicting postoperative complications, extended ICU stays, and prolonged hospital stays. Implementing these scoring systems could enhance patient care and improve surgical decision-making.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kizilbay et al. (2025) conducted an observational in isolated coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) (n=393). Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) and age-adjusted CCI (ACCI) was evaluated on in-hospital mortality (OR 1.865, 95% CI 1.117-3.116, p=0.017). The Charlson Comorbidity Index independently predicted in-hospital mortality (OR 1.865; 95% CI 1.117-3.116; p=0.017) among patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass grafting.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: