Key result
Fluoroscopic assessment of load-induced glenohumeral translation during a 30° shoulder abduction test showed moderate to good interrater (ICC 0.803; 95% CI 0.691-0.877) and intrarater reliability.
Why the study?
Rotator cuff tears are linked to superior translational instability, but a thorough understanding of glenohumeral motion is lacking.
Observational (n=10)
Fluoroscopic assessment is a reliable method for measuring inferior–superior glenohumeral translation in the scapular plane during shoulder abduction.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports fluoroscopic glenohumeral translation measurement in research; leaves open clinical adoption without further validation.
Rotator cuff tears are often linked to superior translational instability, but a thorough understanding of glenohumeral motion is lacking. This study aimed to assess the reliability of fluoroscopically measured glenohumeral translation during a shoulder abduction test. Ten patients with rotator cuff tears participated in this study. Fluoroscopic images were acquired during 30° abduction and adduction in the scapular plane with and without handheld weights of 2 kg and 4 kg. Images were labelled by two raters, and inferior–superior glenohumeral translation was calculated. During abduction, glenohumeral translation (mean (standard deviation)) ranged from 3.3 (2.2) mm for 0 kg to 4.1 (1.8) mm for 4 kg, and from 2.3 (1.5) mm for 0 kg to 3.8 (2.2) mm for 4 kg for the asymptomatic and symptomatic sides, respectively. For the translation range, moderate to good interrater (intra-class correlation coefficient ICC [95% confidence interval (CI)]; abduction: 0.803 [0.691; 0.877]; adduction: 0.705 [0.551; 0.813]) and intrarater reliabilities (ICC [95% CI]; abduction: 0.817 [0.712; 0.887]; adduction: 0.688 [0.529; 0.801]) were found. Differences in the translation range between the repeated measurements were not statistically significant (mean difference, interrater: abduction, −0.1 mm, p = 0.686; adduction, −0.1 mm, p = 0.466; intrarater: abduction 0.0 mm, p = 0.888; adduction, 0.2 mm, p = 0.275). This method is suitable for measuring inferior–superior glenohumeral translation in the scapular plane.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Croci et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Rotator cuff tears (n=10). Fluoroscopic assessment of glenohumeral translation was evaluated on Interrater reliability of translation range during abduction (ICC 0.803, 95% CI 0.691-0.877). Fluoroscopic assessment of load-induced glenohumeral translation during a 30° shoulder abduction test showed moderate to good interrater (ICC 0.803; 95% CI 0.691-0.877) and intrarater reliability.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: