Key result
Prophylactic infusion of norepinephrine significantly reduced the incidence of maternal tachycardia compared to ephedrine (4.2% vs 30.6%, OR 0.11) during elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Why the study?
While studies have shown the efficacy of norepinephrine compared to phenylephrine for maternal hypotension during cesarean section, few studies have compared norepinephrine to ephedrine.
Does prophylactic norepinephrine reduce the incidence of tachycardia compared to ephedrine in women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia?
RCT (n=97)
Double-blind
Computer-generated number
No
Does prophylactic norepinephrine reduce the incidence of tachycardia compared to ephedrine in women undergoing elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia?
Odds Ratio: 0.11 (95% CI 0.02–0.47)
Absolute Event Rate: 4.2% vs 30.6%
p-value: p=0.002
Prophylactic norepinephrine infusion results in a lower incidence of maternal tachycardia and better fetal acid-base status compared to ephedrine during elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Supports prophylactic norepinephrine over ephedrine in elective cesarean sections under spinal anesthesia; extends evidence guiding vasopressor selection in obstetrics.
BACKGROUND: Studies have shown the efficacy of norepinephrine in the treatment of maternal hypotension during cesarean section by comparing it to treatment with phenylephrine. However, few studies have compared the efficacy of norepinephrine to ephedrine. METHODS: Ninety-seven women undergoing elective cesarean section were administered norepinephrine at 4 μg/minute (group N; n = 48) or ephedrine at 4 mg/minute (group E; n = 49) immediately postspinal anesthesia, with an on-off titration to maintain systolic blood pressure (SBP) at 80% to 120% of baseline. A rescue bolus of 8 μg norepinephrine was given whenever SBP reached the predefined lower limit. Our primary outcome was the incidence of tachycardia. Secondary outcomes included the incidence of bradycardia, hypertension, hypotension, severe hypotension, hypotensive episodes, number of rescue top-ups, hemodynamic performance error including median performance error (MDPE), and median absolute performance error (MDAPE). Neonatal Apgar scores and umbilical arterial (UA) blood gas data were also collected. RESULTS: Women in group N experienced fewer cases of tachycardia (4.2% vs 30.6%, P = .002, odds ratio: 0.11 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.02-0.47]), a lower standardized heart rate (HR) (70.3 ± 11 vs 75 ± 11, P = .04, difference: 4.7 ± 2.2 [95% CI: 0.24-9.1]), and a lower MDPE for HR (1.3 ± 9.6 vs 8.4 ± 13.5 bpm, P = .003, difference: 3.1 ± 1.8 [95% CI: -0.6-6.7]). In addition, the lowest or the highest HR was lower in group N compared to group E (both P < .05). Meanwhile, the standardized SBP in group N was lower than that in group E (P = .04). For neonates, the UA blood gas showed a higher base excess (BE) and a lower lactate level in group N compared to E (both P < .001). Other hemodynamic variables, maternal, and neonatal outcomes were similar. CONCLUSION: Infusion of 4 μg/minute norepinephrine presented fewer cases of tachycardia, less fluctuation and a lower HR compared to baseline values, as well as a less stressed fetal status compared to ephedrine infusion at 4 mg/minute. In addition, norepinephrine infusion presented a lower standardized SBP compared to ephedrine.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xu et al. (2019) conducted an RCT in Maternal spinal hypotension (n=97). Norepinephrine vs. Ephedrine 4 mg/minute was evaluated on Incidence of tachycardia (HR >100 bpm) (OR 0.11, 95% CI 0.02-0.47, p=0.002). Prophylactic infusion of norepinephrine significantly reduced the incidence of maternal tachycardia compared to ephedrine (4.2% vs 30.6%, OR 0.11) during elective cesarean section under spinal anesthesia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: