• Multi-criteria assessment for evaluating traffic-related noise and air pollution reduction strategies. • Readily implementable control measures can reduce exposure to traffic-related nuisances. • Access restrictions significantly lower noise and air pollution. • Speed limits have limited noise benefits and may increase air pollution. Reducing children’s exposure to traffic-related noise and air pollution in urban areas is a critical challenge. Therefore, evaluating traffic management strategies in a computational environment offers a practical tool for planners, policymakers, and researchers. However, a key research gap remains: most studies evaluate traffic strategies on air pollution, noise, or traffic separately. Few quantify their combined impacts in a single framework. To address this, we propose a multi-criteria evaluation approach and apply it by comparing four scenarios against a baseline. Through a comprehensive panel of statistical, spatial, and temporal analyses of traffic conditions, air pollutant concentrations, and noise levels, we find that: (1) restricting vehicle access during student arrival times significantly reduces exposure to both noise and air pollution; and (2) speed limit reductions have only limited effects on noise and may, under certain conditions, increase air pollution levels.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Tirico et al. (2025) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: