‘It would be too bad if the question of head segmentation ever should be finally settled; it has been for so long such fertile ground for theorizing that arthropodists would miss it as a field for mental exercise’. Snodgrass, 1960 (cited by Rempel, 1975)The development of the Drosophila embryo has provided an excellent model system for the analysis of embryonic pattern formation. In little more than a decade, many of the elements of the molecular genetic cascade underlying early development have been identified. However, these studies have focused primarily on the development of the central, overtly segmented region of the fruitfly embryo. As the influential insect morphologist R. E. Snodgrass pointed out, understanding of the formation of the complex embryonic head region has advanced quite slowly. Recently, however, substantial progress has been made in the identification and analysis of the genes determining head development. These studies are generating increasing hope that both the structure of the head and how it is formed will soon be significantly clearer. What is perhaps most interesting is that there are already a number of hints that the rules governing head formation may differ from the paradigm established for the central region of the embryo.In this review, we will focus on the process of embryonic head development in Drosophila melanogaster. First, we will describe the evolution of the head, its formation, and some of the difficulties involved in analyzing its structure. We will then discuss what has been learned about the genes responsible for embryonic head development. Finally, the implications of this molecular genetic data for models of head development will be explored.The dipteran Drosophila embryo is one of the most highly evolved of the arthropod embryos. Arthropods, annelids, and other members of the articulate group (see Fig. 1) all show marked similarities in body plan. Most obviously, both arthropods and annelids are metameric in structure, consisting of a series of segmental units. An early definition of a metameric unit was proposed by Snodgrass (1935) as simply a body division of the embryo. This definition, however, was rather crude and was later supplanted by a series of more precise criteria. Rempel (1975), for example, summarized the attributes of a metamere as: (1) a pair of mesodermal somites (which give rise to the muscles) (2) a pair of appendages (3) a pair of apodemes (inner projections of the ectoderm which form muscle attachment sites) and (4) a neuromere (which produces a ganglion and its associated lateral nerves). Although these characteristics are easily recognizable in the metameres of most annelids, in many arthropod segments they are often less evident. In particular regions of arachnids and crustaceans, for example, metamerism is quite difficult to detect. This loss of segmental attributes (which as we shall see is an important issue in Drosophila head development) has occurred in several ways. In a number of cases, particular segments have been lost or fused together during evolution. In various species, segmental appendages are greatly reduced and apodemes and neuromeres difficult to discern.In addition to a metameric body plan, both arthropods and annelids have other similarities in general body structure. Both groups have dorsal hearts and related nervous systems, consisting of an anterior, dorsally located brain and a ventral nerve cord formed of a series of ganglia. Because of these structural similarities, present day articulates are thought to have evolved from a primitive annelid-like organism (see Fig. 1 and, for example, Anderson, 1973). This hypothesized ancestor consisted of an array of metameric units, which showed little evidence of functional or structural specialization. These metameres, as in present-day annelids, were likely to have been generated sequentially from a central growth zone. The ends of this animal were primitive non-segmented structures. The anterior end was probably most similar to the anterior ‘prostomial’ region of modem annelids, housing a simple brain (archicerebrum). This ‘head’ area was involved in sensory and feeding functions. The posterior ‘tail’ region most likely consisted of a nonsegmented area surrounding the anal opening.The evolutionary process of head formation involved the progressive incorporation of structures into the head region (see Fig. 2). In animals even more primitive than the annelids (e.g. the Platyhelminthes), there is already an increasing concentration of sensory and feeding structures (eyes, ganglia and tentacles) in the anterior region. A critical step in this process of ‘cephalization’ occurred when several of the anterior-most trunk segments became incorporated into the beginnings of a clearly recognizable head region. This process is already evident in certain annelid embryos (e.g. the polychaete Nereis) in which the head includes regions called the prostomium (anterior to the mouth opening) and the peristomium (surrounding the mouth). Although the precise origin of the peristomium is unclear, it is generally thought to include one or more former trunk segments. One piece of evidence for this is that the peristomium contains pairs of cirri, which are likely the remnants of the parapodia, the appendages present on annelid trunk metameres. Cephalization continued as evolution proceeded and is evident in present-day myriapods (centipedes and millipedes). The insect head, consisting of an asegmental terminal region and cephalized trunk segments, first appeared in primitive form during the Devonian period (Smart and Hughes, 1972). However, because of the scarcity of fossil material from this period, its structural form has been deduced largely through the comparative analysis of more recent species.As cephalization occurred, several of the anterior-most trunk segments shifted forward, so that they came to lie in of the mouth These segments became and of more example, the and anterior of the it to an important sensory The of the head is often to as the is in this region that segmental are most difficult to the mouth is the of the head as the In this cephalized trunk segments have for feeding functions. As evolution the trunk segments became into and clearly functional the embryo to the complex Drosophila body the Drosophila of this process of head has been the evolution of a series of complex which during of development. this a series of complex (which will be in the posterior anal region and of understanding of the process of head formation from the studies of and the of the embryo is and segmental are clearly and In the head a series of be identified. These include the and as as and this the to and a series of and of the head that the process of head the to the the anterior end of the embryo and largely (see Fig. As a the the of the the and and form the lateral of the and the the of the The head structures then the first This highly process of head is a recent evolutionary development. in the of the Drosophila a of the that most of the head structures are to the anterior end of the head a of the head region a of and sensory structures (see Fig. These structures include various easily recognizable elements (which in pairs and the as as the mouth and several sensory In the head of the first these structures be easily in This has important implications First, it studies to be in which regions of the early embryo are and the on head development the of that head development on the formation of head structures be Both these have been critical to understanding the structure of the head Rempel to as the about insect head development the of the number and of the segments in the This has been several have involved the comparative of the of a of have to describe head segmentation in Rempel, have been critical of in these The first issue is there is a of the embryonic head that is in in structure. Although most that there is an asegmental region to as the there have been that the insect head is metameric in The which is clearly related to the has involved the number of segments present in the This number has been to be as as and as as (e.g. has been about the which is of easily segments. These the and segments, clearly the for metameric in the In the however, segmental are more difficult to recent studies Rempel and have proposed that the anterior region is of the asegmental and segments. anterior to these include the and segments. However, the metameric of the and segments in particular has been In some have hypothesized that the posterior region of the is in an (e.g. the highly evolved form of the has made segmental identification difficult by As a various other have been analysis of was to various to on the and and and have this by This has been in determining the pattern of in various embryonic the region. has definition of the of the segments and of the of the that give rise to In it was that as one in the anterior is from an region of the In a of about was as the region. This region a pattern of of that of the more ventral Although the was to of several groups of in this segmental were to the structural analysis of the head has been This has on the analysis of marked of to the regions of the that give rise to rather than embryonic head structures. The head of Drosophila is formed from pairs of which during Most head the head and are from the The and the are formed from the and analyzing of in and and showed that the other is into anterior and posterior This division was to the of the However, the of the anterior and posterior of this were to be the posterior rise to the anterior region of the this analysis was to show that the which is from a as a of a that the This analysis important to head The first is that the of the head is from a region anterior to the the of a The is segments from regions of the there is on the for segments the and this genetic analysis the of the and is a model of the insect that has been to head structure is analyzing the of the of development. This has been and by and and by We will discuss the of and it has the of In these Drosophila embryos were the or the end of the of In was in regions of the head region anterior of the the that occurred in the of the that from the regions of the and the embryo that give rise to structures be however, that in of the head and were The from this is in Fig. The in this was the of regions the recognizable head in the embryo. was that the Drosophila head is from the and segmental present the all of these proposed segments are of of embryonic The most anterior segments in particular of regions of the (see Fig. the evidence be summarized as The Drosophila head, the insect head, is in structure. The first region is the asegmental which rise to the brain the and several of the elements of the The and sensory structures in Fig. are from the segmented region of the This region segments which from anterior to the and segments. are about which some The first the As some have there may be regions of the that are in the remnants of segments. The area about which there is some is the of the head segments. some about the region is a metamere and the in the highly evolved Drosophila As we will molecular genetic studies have provided to these of head the Drosophila pattern formation is during the first of development review, see The of the embryo are established by of These are by the anterior, posterior and groups of In the central trunk from the anterior and posterior groups is into the metameric pattern of the embryo through the of a cascade of The and genes the embryo into the of The of these are by the genes of the complex and complex are by segments, which the head is of the asegmental and a segmental These regions are primarily by the genes of the terminal and anterior As will be however, the is in in the region of the head by the terminal group of In this we will what is about the genes in these that are for head development. we will group these genes the that have been established for the trunk region of the embryo. However, as will be the of these genes are in the head of the embryo are established by a which a to the formation of various structural The genes involved in this include and in and in of these genes in the loss of terminal which in the anterior head region include the and the of the In posterior terminal elements are The a which is the embryo and by a the its a by the which is the Drosophila of the This of to be similar to the the and the several genes have been that are elements of the of these genes is involved in the of both ends of the we will focus primarily on anterior of the in the of a of the structures that are from the anterior terminal embryos are most of the brain the ganglion and probably the most anterior region of the and of the dorsal and dorsal These from the posterior of the anterior terminal region. to be for the of the of the in the anterior which is a structure the anterior of the region. Although and are together probably for the development of the posterior terminal they are probably the genes for the anterior This be deduced from the that the which is in of the is present in both and has been by and and to a that is quite similar to the members of the of This both the region and the Although it is in terminal anterior to a region which probably its of This includes that to be which give rise to the to a for the as a This is the that is for of the and head genes in particular terminal regions and In in its anterior the of and and may as an and The to be a critical of and in the that the formation of the ends of the embryo. The has been and to a and a in have been which to a of These head and and the trunk are established by the genes of the and In the of and to be of of the Although the the segmented of the head, we will include it because of its functional similarities to and both the head and the regions of the embryo. In terminal regions anterior and into segmental the anterior the structures include head dorsal and the and the the and which are from the in the of these asegmental structures into head the posterior end of the embryo. In both cases, loss of to the of the embryo. Although the the region by the the anterior which to the the includes anterior of the the region. the anterior perhaps from the in end of the embryo. to the regions are more posterior the and more anterior the posterior head structures from the are into anterior structures anterior segments posterior of and are from of the This is by the genetic these and in the in the have been to the genes of the and and In group these genes are a of However, the of is in such that the region by is from the trunk An genetic analysis showed that the is in embryos and The functional and and the genes of the and is by molecular The a which has may have a and is to a interesting a The of the and during include the regions that give rise to the structures by will be to the of of central trunk of the embryo the and from the region of the from As a of genes has been to be responsible for the more of the embryo. In the anterior region of the the critical has been to be and The is by the of the and genes a concentration and that in the posterior However, in embryos the segments, the head region is and by a of asegmental structures. This that is the for the of all the head segments. The of this process will be in the that has been to be a of is and In embryos for embryonic are and These are the and segments and the and of the segments The of the the most posterior of the head segments, is by the of the and the a of the (see Fig. the more anterior head segments to be present in embryos. The has been to a which is in the anterior of the a that head segments is As in the of in this more than one region of the embryo. In the head, structures from the and segments are segments are all the from this region is as a of the anterior head to in of the head from the embryo. The has been and to a a that it in other as a of segmentation The pattern of during early is interesting difficult to the is in about in and are in regions that give rise to and However, in the of be identified. In a significantly region than the The of this may be when to the of the and other segmentation genes have been identified. These include and other genes as as the of particular of by and embryos all head and structures. is for development of the head there be other genes responsible for more anterior head segments. have proposed the of an or genes which would be than is such a should in the of a of head of the involved in to head genes is the in head structures in embryos. that head in in the head which structural (see for example, the of the however, head structures or is to (e.g. sensory In as will be there are genes may as segmental in anterior head have been which anterior head segments. were in a for segmental The has been and by because it is for the development of the system in in the of anterior head structures. The of the head however, is and that is a the of the and segments. However, as they out, be to and have proposed a segmental of the head which will be in The has been and to a the the is in an anterior This is the of the of form the the to head regions of the for an anterior is in the of an of head structures more anterior than by and example, both the of the the and the the and are of the that are from the As in the of be in embryos. The has been and to be in a anterior the This that of is However, the anterior of is by the which in the anterior of the a of the is the the as which a similar for the and has been to to in the and The of this is that in this anterior segmented region is As in the of and head in embryos. The structures by form a that more than of or and evidence for be The has been so the molecular of its will discuss this because little is about the of genes in terminal and segmental head development. A number of genes are in in the region and are for the of the for example, in the of the the and segments and have been to be in more anterior regions the and In is to a dorsal region of the for example, is in a dorsal region from as as in a about the and the in both the and genes segmental and and the of these genes in the regions is the trunk genes to and segmental in of these genes often of pattern of the genes in this are first in one in which example, the of the and genes the anterior and posterior of addition to in the and are in in the segments and in in more anterior head This anterior in the of the and segmental as as in The genes in the and to be in all head segments As will be these are in analyzing these anterior Because the of on anterior head segments are difficult to is an important molecular for these in the trunk region are by the genes of the and In addition to several other the contains reduced and of these genes and are for the embryonic head formation and will be should first be however, that these genes were because of the segmental of head structures by particular in the of however, is it that similar be in the embryonic head was because of the structures piece and are thought to be of the In head and several other head structures from the are As other be embryos the of head when the and of the head molecular analysis of has been quite important in the of the The contains a and is the most of the genes is in of the the from which the was thought to it is in more anterior the lateral of the and that in regions for head A critical region in this process may be the for which be a This is on a of the of in the Drosophila embryo the of the in more primitive insect The pattern of the that some of the head are a of the of head was as a that the formation of the head and loss of were that were to embryonic head development. However, the of the head of embryos that embryos have head and that head structures of and to a and origin are or A group similar the of an anterior of the head This was in a and may the loss of However, of the by a of many head and segments a and contains a The is in a the and later in the region of the and segments. by and have that the of from and genes for its is for the formation of the as as for the segments of the embryo and In a of the to a is by the of of the in the segmental region The has been to a and to be in the regions of the embryo by In the head the is first and in the As in the of is and has been to be by in of segmentation genes pattern formation in the Drosophila head the development of the central region of the In of models of head development are The first model is that head formation the of genetic that the In this the by the various of genes would be in the head and the structural difficulties in head segments these difficult to The model of head development is in to a of a or system of genetic has evolved in the head region. a model be to be more in in to a of In it include of as as all the in the molecular and genetic evidence the of model of head formation. both and genetic studies that the head is of The anterior terminal (which includes the and is primarily by a genetic system which is quite from that in the This system is by what to be a cascade that the terminal there are genetic the head which terminal development a segmental ground as by and are quite they would be even in the annelid-like ancestor of the articulates (see In the terminal head from the system to its anterior In the of the anterior region is by posterior terminal of the head, the segmented is by the anterior of However, evidence that head segmentation is by or rules segmentation in the trunk region. and for example, have proposed a model for the of head a comparative of and they have that these genes form an of head This analysis was in an to the of the which is in a segmental pattern the embryo In addition to analyzing they that of these segments, as by the pattern The which include are of by one such that and in anterior In the on the to be in rather than These proposed in the head, these genes may be to of segments, to segmental this is and would be as and In such a the of head be by the of genes its will be important to if there are genes that are in the posterior head segments. is however, that of the segments is more similar to that of the trunk that other of genes that in the trunk are in the head region. The analysis by and is interesting in this the of of the genes from the they that these genes are in in the This from the of genes in the In the various genes are in anterior head or to show less of may if the model is that is for segments in this the of the to have evolved during the process of head which head segmental development a trunk ground would be for the cephalization of anterior trunk segments first evolutionary step in Fig. 2). This the of the development of a more complex studies will if there are other members of this of genes to the head of the embryo as from the central trunk molecular genetic data is to the area of metameric in the The of the genes are in head segments. is to that these which in the are in segmental in the The for example, the and the of all head segments in In these that there is segmentation in These are metameres, is in the of that head to how development is in the head and it will be critical to the precise of example, are the head genes and by in the head to the molecular cascade in the terminal differ in the head and As in the trunk the of this of should models of head formation. should be that there are other that head development that we have (e.g. as as perhaps area in this is the development of the head in This process (which during the from is of embryonic head formation, should increasing on the example, many of the genes important in the development of the In several cases, the of of these genes during head development in during embryonic will be important to such in or simply in is likely that understanding Drosophila head formation will have important implications for Recently, for example, an increasing of evidence that the as a series of segments or review, see in have that various and genes to be in that example, there are of the genes of the and which are in on the in The anterior of of these as in the to these is the and are In this it will be important to there are of the genes which are in more anterior head increasing understanding of the rules governing Drosophila head development is certain to to models of would to the members of the for critical of the We for and and for to We to we have or to We are to and for many of the which this is Finally, we are to the of this significantly its was by the and by an to
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Finkelstein et al. (1991) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 3 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: