Key result
Transthoracic echocardiography-guided implantation of permanent cardiac implantable electronic devices was feasible and safe, achieving successful placement without fluoroscopy and zero complications at 90 days.
Why the study?
Fluoroscopy for CIED implantation exposes patients and providers to radiation, prompting investigation into the safety and feasibility of non-fluoroscopic, TTE-guided permanent CIED placement.
Is TTE-guided permanent CIED placement safe and feasible in patients requiring initial device implantation?
Observational (n=15)
No
Is TTE-guided permanent CIED placement safe and feasible in patients requiring initial device implantation?
TTE-guided CIED implantation is a feasible and safe alternative to traditional fluoroscopy, potentially eliminating radiation exposure for both patients and operators.
TTE-guided CIED implantation may offer a radiation-free option; this case report leaves open its safety and efficacy in routine practice.
BACKGROUND: Permanent cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIEDs) are traditionally implanted with the assistance of fluoroscopy. While clinically effective, this technique exposes both patients and providers to radiation which is associated with adverse health effects and represents an occupational hazard. In this study, we investigate the safety and feasibility of permanent CIED placement under the guidance of transthoracic echocardiography (TTE). There is also increasing interest in use of non-fluoroscopic options for noninvasive cardiac electrophysiologic procedures. METHODS: Fifteen patients consecutively consented for initial implant of CIEDs, specifically dual chamber pacemakers (DCPM) and dual chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillators (DCICDs). Patients were excluded if they had previous implants, abandoned leads, or anatomic anomalies including congenital and known persistent left superior vena cava (PLSVC). We used TTE to guide and implant atrial and ventricular leads. RESULTS: Eleven patients received DCPMs and four patients received DCICDs. The procedure duration was 49.3 min for DCICD and 52.3 min for DCPM, p = .807. The average number of right atrial lead attempts was 1.6 for DCPMs and 1.8 for DCICD, p = .860. The average number of right ventricular lead attempts for DCPMs was 2.2 and 1.0 attempt for DCICDs, p = .044. There were no complications at 90-day follow-up. CONCLUSION: We demonstrate the feasibility of TTE-guided DCPM/DCICD implantation without use of fluoroscopy. We present this method as a safe alternative for permanent CIED placement that may reduce risk of radiation exposure and cost while maintaining safety and efficacy. No operators wore lead aprons during the procedure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sogade et al. (2021) conducted an observational in Indication for permanent cardiac implantable electronic devices (n=15). Transthoracic echocardiography (TTE)-guided CIED implantation was evaluated on Feasibility and safety (procedure duration, lead attempts, and 90-day complications). Transthoracic echocardiography-guided implantation of permanent cardiac implantable electronic devices was feasible and safe, achieving successful placement without fluoroscopy and zero complications at 90 days.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: