Key result
Clustered temporal sampling in phylogenetic analyses of FMD viruses strongly biases the inferences of substitution rates and time to the most recent common ancestor by reflecting a rate closer to the short-term mutation rate.
In viral phylogenetic studies, using densely sampled sequences from outbreaks can severely bias estimates of long-term substitution rates and tMRCA by reflecting short-term mutation rates instead.
Clustered sampling risks distorting viral evolutionary timelines; leaves open optimal protocols for unbiased phylogenetic inference.
With the emergence of analytical software for the inference of viral evolution, a number of studies have focused on estimating important parameters such as the substitution rate and the time to the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA) for rapidly evolving viruses. Coupled with an increasing abundance of sequence data sampled under widely different schemes, an effort to keep results consistent and comparable is needed. This study emphasizes commonly disregarded problems in the inference of evolutionary rates in viral sequence data when sampling is unevenly distributed on a temporal scale through a study of the foot-and-mouth (FMD) disease virus serotypes SAT 1 and SAT 2. Our study shows that clustered temporal sampling in phylogenetic analyses of FMD viruses will strongly bias the inferences of substitution rates and tMRCA because the inferred rates in such data sets reflect a rate closer to the mutation rate rather than the substitution rate. Estimating evolutionary parameters from viral sequences should be performed with due consideration of the differences in short-term and longer-term evolutionary processes occurring within sets of temporally sampled viruses, and studies should carefully consider how samples are combined.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pedersen et al. (2015) studied Foot-and-Mouth Disease Virus (FMDV) evolution (n=179). Time-clustered sampling vs. Chronological sampling was evaluated on Substitution rate and time to the most recent common ancestor (tMRCA). Clustered temporal sampling in phylogenetic analyses of FMD viruses strongly biases the inferences of substitution rates and time to the most recent common ancestor by reflecting a rate closer to the short-term mutation rate.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: