We simulate four quantum error correcting codes under error models inspired by realistic noise sources in near-term ion trap quantum computers: T 2 dephasing, gate overrotation, and crosstalk. We use this data to find preferred codes for given error parameters along with logical error biases and a pseudothreshold which compares the physical and logical gate failure rates for a CNOT gate. Using these results we conclude that Bacon–Shor-13 is the most promising near term candidate as long as the impact of crosstalk can be mitigated through other means.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Debroy et al. (2020) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: