Key result
Real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography did not show any statistically significant difference or major advantage compared to conventional 2D-TEE for assessing mitral valve pathology.
Why the study?
Does real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography improve the assessment of mitral valve pathology compared to conventional 2D transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing elective mitral valve repair?
Observational (n=50)
Does real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography improve the assessment of mitral valve pathology compared to conventional 2D transesophageal echocardiography in patients undergoing elective mitral valve repair?
Real-time 3D-TEE did not demonstrate a significant advantage over conventional 2D-TEE for assessing mitral valve pathology during elective repair.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No advantage for 3D- over 2D-TEE in mitral assessment; leaves open need for randomized outcome trials before practice change.
Aim of our study was to investigate the feasibility of use and possible additional value of real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography (RT-3D-TEE) compared to conventional 2D-TEE in patients undergoing elective mitral valve repair. After ethical committee approval, patients were included in this prospective study. After induction of anesthesia, a comprehensive 2D-TEE examination was performed, followed with RT-3D-TEE. The intraoperative surgical finding was used as the gold standard for segmental analysis. Only such segments which were surgically corrected either by resection or insertion of artificial chords were judged pathologic. A total of 50 patients were included in this study; usable data were available from 42 of these patients . Based on the Carpentier classification, the pathology found was type I in 2 (5%) patients, type II in 39 (93%) patients and type IIIb in 1 (2%) patient. We found that 3D imaging of complex mitral disease involving multiple segments, when compared to 2D-TEE did not show any statistically significant difference.RT-3D-TEE did not show any major advantage when compared to conventional 2D-TEE for assessing mitral valve pathology, although further study in a larger population is required to establish the validity of this study.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ender et al. (2011) conducted an observational in Elective mitral valve repair (n=50). Real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography (RT-3D-TEE) vs. Conventional 2D-TEE was evaluated on Segmental analysis of mitral valve pathology compared to intraoperative surgical findings. Real-time 3D transesophageal echocardiography did not show any statistically significant difference or major advantage compared to conventional 2D-TEE for assessing mitral valve pathology.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: