Solvothermal reactions of Cu(NO 3 ) 2 ·3H 2 O with 4,4′-(hexafluoroisopropylidene) bis(benzoic acid) (C 17 H 10 F 6 O 4, H 2 hfbba) and terminal monodentate ligand 3-methyl pyridine (3-picoline/3-mepy) in the presence of N, N -dimethyl formamide (DMF) and N, N -diethyl formamide (DEF) solvents gave rise to two structurally different two-dimensional (2D) fluorinated metal organic frameworks ( F -MOFs). The effect of the choice of solvent has been clearly reflected in the structures obtained. The F -MOFs reported in this paper are formulated as [Cu 2 (hfbba) 2 (3-mepy) 2 ]·(DMF) 2 (3-mepy) ( F- MOF-4 ), [Cu 2 (hfbba) 2 (3-mepy) 2 ] ( Cu- F -MOF-4B ), and [Zn 2 (hfbba) 2 (3-mepy) 2 ]·(3-mepy) ( Zn- F- MOF-4B ) which displays interesting 2D structures with and without interdigitation depending on the solvent used. The structures of these F -MOFs have been determined by X-ray crystallography and further identified by IR spectroscopy, powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD), and thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). The effect of interdigitation has been reflected in the gas adsorption and magnetic properties of these F- MOFs. These F -MOFs also show comparable H 2 and CO 2 uptake depending on their structural variation. Temperature-dependent magnetic susceptibility measurements over a wide range of temperatures exhibit dominantly short-range antiferromagnetic behavior, with weak ferromagnetic behavior showing up at very low temperatures, which is evident from opening of the hysteresis loop with a finite value of coercivity in both F- MOF-4 and Cu- F -MOF-4B. We observed a smaller value of μ eff per Cu atom and coercivity in Cu- F -MOF-4B than the F -MOF-4 due to relatively larger distances between the neighboring dicopper paddlewheel secondary building unit.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pachfule et al. (2011) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: