Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
There has been concern about the ideal length of time to effectively offer graduate content. Programs of less than two full years have been suspect. Thus study reports on two groups of social workers in the same program who have been professionally active for over twenty years. They completed the master's requirements under two different time conditions: One group completed study in twelve months; the other in the traditional two year period. The accelerated group reported the five major curriculum areas were more useful in their practice. In addition, they reported higher long-range achievement scores on the identical objectives of both programs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Meinert et al. (1989) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: