Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Electrochemical impedance spectroscopic (EIS) and scanning electrochemical microscopic (SECM) techniques are used primarily to evaluate the corrosion protection performance of epoxy-coated 3% Cr steel. Wet/dry cyclic corrosion tests (EIS) were performed on epoxy-coated carbon and 3% Cr steel samples in a 3 % NaCl solution. The EIS results showed that corrosion resistance of 3% Cr steel sample is greater than carbon steel sample. In order to determine the tip potentials for dissolution of Fe2+ and Cr2+, cyclic voltammetry experiments were performed using the SECM tip at open circuit potential (OCP). The tip potential was set at -0.7, +0.04 and +0.60 V to determine the concentration of dissolved oxygen, and dissolution of Cr2+ and Fe2+ respectively. The dissolution of Fe2+ at the scratch defect was much lower in coated 3% Cr steel than in carbon steel. The consumption of oxygen was less for 3% Cr steel which is attributed to the fact that the dissolved oxygen reduction was decreased on the surface of 3% Cr steel compared to carbon steel. Thus, it was indicated that the weaker anodic and cathodic reactions were observed at the scratch of coated 3% Cr steel. In the case of dissolved oxygen, the tip current decreases for 3% Cr steel, which is ascribed to the reduction in the amount of dissolved oxygen over the sample surface. Corrosion resistance was much higher for the 3% Cr steel sample because the anodic and cathodic reactions at the scratch were weaker for coated 3% Cr steel than carbon steel.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Toshiyuki Nishimura (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: