Key result
The highest risk area for injuring the right coronary artery during tricuspid interventions corresponds to the posterior annulus, with an average distance of 2.53 mm.
Why the study?
Danger zones between the tricuspid annulus, the coronary sinus, and the right coronary artery needed characterization to inform surgical and endovascular tricuspid interventions.
Observational (n=36)
No
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anatomical measurements of tricuspid annulus proximity to RCA and CS may inform procedural planning; leaves open need for in vivo validation.
The aim of this study was to describe danger zones between the tricuspid annulus and the coronary sinus and the right coronary artery to be considered during tricuspid interventions. Methods: 36 hearts from human adult corpses were dissected. We measured the distance between the middle third of the anterosuperior (anterior) leaflet to the right coronary artery (distance 1), between the anteroinferior (anteroposterior) commissure to right coronary artery (distance 2), between the middle third of inferior (posterior) leaflet to the right coronary artery (distance 3) and between the middle third of the septal leaflet to the ostium of the coronary sinus (distance 4). Distances were compared between right and left coronary dominance. The average distance 1 was 5,32 mm (1-11 mm), the average distance 2 was 3,07 mm (0.5-7 mm), the average distance 3 was 2,53 mm (0.5-12 mm) and the average distance 4 was 8,55 mm (2.5-18 mm). 31 hearts had right dominance, 4 left dominance and 1 co-dominance. We found no statistically significant differences between hearts with right and left coronary dominance at either D1 (5.26±2.55 mm vs 6.62±1.80 mm, p=0.213) or D4 (8.55±3.91 mm vs 11.62±0.95 mm, p=0.064). The highest risk area of injuring the right coronary artery corresponds to the posterior annulus (distance 3). In hearts with left dominance, tricuspid annulus has a safer distance to the right coronary artery and coronary sinus and therefore may present a lower risk of right coronary artery involvement in surgical and endovascular procedures.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Cubas et al. (2022) conducted an observational in Normal cardiac anatomy (n=36). Left coronary dominance vs. Right coronary dominance was evaluated on Distance from the middle third of the anterosuperior leaflet to the right coronary artery (D1) (p=0.213). The highest risk area for injuring the right coronary artery during tricuspid interventions corresponds to the posterior annulus, with an average distance of 2.53 mm.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: