On elementary theories, the ionic current i through the oxide is expected in the steady state to depend on the field strength E in the oxide (as measured by oxide overpotential/thickness of oxide) and the temperature T according to an equation of the form i = i0exp { – (W – qaE)/kT}, where i0, W and a are constants which have different significance according to the model, q is the charge on the ion, and k is Boltzmann’s constant. The relation has been investigated experimentally by a spectrophotometric method of determining the thickness of the oxide. It was found that the experimental results for dilute solutions could be represented within less than 1 % of E at 2490 Ả thickness by the above equation with qaE replaced by q(α + βE) E where α and β are constants with i0 = 108.24 A/cm2, W = 2.185 eV, α = 6.995Ả,β = – 3.35Ả/(107 V/cm) and q = 5e. The modifications that occur as the concentration of acid is increased have been investigated. In concentrated acid, although less charge is required to form a film of given optical thickness, the films have a lower a.c. capacity, and require a higher overpotential to produce a given ionic current density. The capacity of films formed to a given overpotential at a given current density is almost independent of the concentration of the acid. The significance of the results is discussed in connexion with how far the existence of a range of site parameters (in particular, activation energy and activation distance) in an amorphous oxide tends to explain them, or whether a more fundamental change in the equations used to describe ionic movement is required.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
L. Young (1960) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 2 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: