The lust i otitemmuictul react imomu for Imuct ate dclivolriogemu:use ( LI)H ( aol ivity pro odtuces mu ptuttermm of dark (Type I) mumudligiut (Type II) fibers 1mmskeletal muscle (Duhoiiwit z mumm(lPearse, I!i.toc/oenoie 2: 105, 19(10; Etigeh, .Veulolog!J 12: 778, 1962).We have oobsomrved i muiuummuumo mumumud gnu mica pig iiiimscie I iumut piuemual#{176} fronim suppressimug lime 'l'viue I fiber ) Fig. 1, rigimt).f I mmterpret t iuese results we sloeotuh:oi e t limit P prommmotes elect rmmu I rtumusfer ho oyloo('lmromime oxidase, t imus inpmussimug I hue NBT acceptor mind decremusimug t hue tummnotumut of formmmmuzamu oleloomsitiomi.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brody et al. (1964) studied this question.