Molecular rotational friction coefficients (ζ) were determined for neat water-d2, neat acetonitrile-d3, neat acetonitrile, a 15% solution of chloroform-d1 in chloroform, and a 3% solution of benzene-d6 in benzene by measuring 2H and 14N nuclear magnetic resonance spin–lattice relaxation times as a function of pressure (0.1–300 MPa). The pressure dependencies of the rotational ζ values were obtained from the single-body rotational correlation times for deuterated molecules in each liquid. The pressure dependencies were compared with those of the translational and viscous ζ values derived, respectively, from the known self-diffusion coefficients and viscosities. In such simple molecular liquids as chloroform and benzene, the translational and viscous ζ values had almost the same pressure coefficient or activation volume, whereas the rotational ζ values had considerably smaller pressure coefficients. The fractional viscosity (η) exponent α in the phenomenological linear relation between ζ and ηα was 0.9 for the translational ζ in acetonitrile and 0.4–0.6 for the rotational ζ in acetonitrile (tumbling motion), chloroform, and benzene. Water was found to be exceptional because the pressure dependence of ζ depended more strongly on the modes of molecular motions. The deviation of the viscosity exponent from unity clearly indicates a breakdown of the Stokes–Einstein–Debye law with respect to pressure variations. The viscosity exponent is not universal, but specific to intermolecular interactions and therefore dependent on the liquid structure.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Wakai et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: