Key result
Computed tomography irradiation of cardiac implantable electronic devices in a phantom model caused oversensing and pauses up to 8.0 s, but no clinically significant adverse events.
Why the study?
Knowledge regarding the influence of computed tomography irradiation on modern cardiac implantable electronic devices is limited, requiring evaluation of adverse events and safety measures.
Does computed tomography irradiation cause clinically significant adverse events in cardiac implantable electronic devices?
Does computed tomography irradiation cause clinically significant adverse events in cardiac implantable electronic devices?
Standard computed tomography protocols are highly unlikely to cause clinically significant adverse events in modern cardiac implantable electronic devices, suggesting routine pre-scan device reprogramming may be unnecessary.
Introduction: Cardiac implantable electronic devices are used in patients with cardiac rhythm disorders. Computed tomography irradiation is not prohibited for patients with cardiac implantable electronic devices, despite adverse events being reported. Hence, appropriate preparation and knowledge are required before computed tomography irradiation can be carried out in these patients. Since there is limited knowledge or literature about the influence of computed tomography irradiation in cases with recent cardiac implantable electronic devices, we aimed to evaluate the adverse events and elucidate the necessary and sufficient safety measures associated with this therapy. Methods and Results: We placed cardiac implantable electronic devices on an anthropomorphic phantom model and observed their electrical activity in electrograms, while various protocols of computed tomography irradiation were implemented and adverse events evaluated. Oversensing with pauses of up to 3.2 s was observed in standard computed tomography protocols, but ventricular tachyarrhythmia or other clinically significant events could not be confirmed. Oversensing with pauses of up to 8.0 s was observed and ventricular tachyarrhythmia was detected in the maximum-dose protocols. However, treatments such as antitachycardia pacing or shock therapy for ventricular tachyarrhythmia were not observed because of their absence. Conclusion: Computed tomography irradiation for patients using cardiac implantable electronic devices is highly unlikely to cause clinically significant adverse events with the device settings and computed tomography protocols currently being used. Changing or monitoring the device settings routinely before computed tomography irradiation is not necessarily required for most patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ideishi et al. (2023) studied Cardiac rhythm disorders. Computed tomography irradiation was evaluated on Adverse events including oversensing, pauses, and ventricular tachyarrhythmia. Computed tomography irradiation of cardiac implantable electronic devices in a phantom model caused oversensing and pauses up to 8.0 s, but no clinically significant adverse events.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: