Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Functional domains of the bacteriophage phi 29 prohead RNA (pRNA) that are essential for in vitro packaging of DNA-gp3 into the prohead were mapped using pRNA mutants. Oligonucleotide-directed mutant pRNAs were produced that contained deletions and sequence alterations but were predicted to retain the overall secondary structure of wild-type pRNA. Mutant pRNAs were compared to wild-type pRNA for prohead binding in a competition assay and for DNA packaging in the defined in vitro system. The prohead binding site was previously localized to residues 22-84 on the 120-residue domain I of pRNA by ribonuclease footprinting (Reid, R. J. D., Bodley, J. W., and Anderson, D. (1994) J. Biol. Chem. 269, 5157-5162). Mutations of pRNA within the prohead binding site resulted in substantial loss of prohead binding capacity, while mutations outside of the footprint had moderate effects on prohead binding. DNA-gp3 packaging activity was correlated with pRNA binding activity for mutations within the footprint. This mutational analysis showed that both sequence and secondary structure of residues 40-91 of pRNA were crucial for prohead binding and that elements of the A helix formed from residues 1-28 and 117-92 were needed for DNA packaging functions other than prohead binding.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Reid et al. (1994) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: