The suitability of control materials for determination of alpha-amylase activity was assessed in comparison with reference groups of authentic human serum specimens containing alpha-amylase of either pancreatic or salivary origin, specimens from patients with no pancreatic pathology, and normal specimens to which porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase was added. After determination of alpha-amylase activity by 11 commonly used techniques (five different principles), the results were processed by both classical (linear representation, regression) and multivariate (correspondence analysis, principal-components analysis) statistical techniques. Specimens containing porcine pancreatic alpha-amylase did not behave like any of the other groups. We conclude that porcine enzyme should not be used for interlaboratory quality-control surveys or intermethod comparison studies. Determination of human salivary and pancreatic alpha-amylase showed intermethod biases similar to those for authentic patients' specimens. Human salivary alpha-amylase, both because of its behavior and its commercial availability, is a satisfactory source for alpha-amylase activity of quality-control specimens. The nature of the matrix (polyvinylpyrrolidone, albumin, delipidated serum, bovine serum, or human serum) little influenced the behavior of the specimens for any of the methods studied.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bretaudière et al. (1981) studied this question.