Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
AIMS: To evaluate the diversity, prevalence, and phenotypic and genotypic characteristics of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative bacteria (CR-GNB) causing bloodstream infections, and assess the mechanisms driving their dissemination through a multi-center study in nine hospitals of Ecuador. METHODS AND RESULTS: Between November 2021 and May 2022, 297 Gram-negative bacteria (GNB) were isolated from 273 patients across nine hospitals in Ecuador. Genotypic characterization of carbapenem-resistant GNB from blood cultures was performed by whole genome sequencing (WGS). CR-GNB accounted for 18.8% (56/297), predominantly Klebsiella pneumoniae (41.1%), followed by Enterobacter cloacae complex (16.1%), Acinetobacter baumannii (12.5%), and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (7.1%). CR-GNB showed high resistance to cephalosporins (80%-95%), piperacillin-tazobactam (85.7%), ampicillin-sulbactam (91.1%), and ciprofloxacin (78.6%). Genomic analysis revealed carbapenemase genes blaKPC-2 (most frequent), blaNDM-1, and blaOXA-181 across high-risk clones (e.g. K. pneumoniae ST307, ST258, ST147; A. baumannii ST1187). Carbapenemase genes were plasmid-borne (IncA/C, IncM, IncN, IncF, IncHI2, IncX3, and non-typeable) and associated with transposons (Tn4401, Tn125, and Tn3). Also, blaVIM-2 in Pseudomonas spp. was plasmid- and chromosomally encoded. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings demonstrate a high burden of CR-GNB, primarily due to K. pneumoniae and E. cloacae complex. Furthermore, the widespread distribution of blaKPC-2, blaNDM-1, and blaOXA-181 in high-risk clones, coupled with the frequent plasmid- and transposon-mediated mobilization of these genes, highlights the crucial role of horizontal gene transfer in the dissemination of resistance.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zurita et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: