Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Lytic polysaccharide monooxygenases (LPMOs) are mononuclear copper enzymes that act in synergy with glycoside hydrolases to saccharify the most abundant polysaccharides in nature. Both O 2 and H 2 O 2 can be cosubstrates for LPMOs. The Lentinus similis LPMO (LsAA9A) has previously been shown to oxidatively cleave oligosaccharides when supplied with ascorbate as a reductant. This study demonstrates that LsAA9A is unable to complete the catalytic cycle and cleave cellulose without H 2 O 2 . Instead, cellooligomers efficiently prevent the slow continuous oxidation of ascorbate taking place under ambient conditions in the absence of a substrate. LsAA9A specifically cleaves cellooligomers in a fast and stoichiometric reaction with H 2 O 2 as a cosubstrate. However, the product profile contains more non-oxidized saccharides than anticipated by the generally accepted LPMO reaction scheme. The scission of glucosidic bonds and oxidation of the saccharide therefore appear not to be directly coupled. This was confirmed by the complete absence of oxidized products under anoxic conditions. A mechanism is proposed involving the hydrolysis of a cellulosic radical formed by a H 2 O 2 -derived caged hydroxyl radical. In addition, LsAA9A catalyzes another stoichiometric reaction with excess H 2 O 2 to oxidize ascorbate in the absence of cellulose. Ascorbate is not a cosubstrate for the reaction leading to the scission of glucosidic bonds by LsAA9A.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Brander et al. (2021) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: