Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reaction of 3,5-diacetylamino-1,2,4-triazole (Hdaat) with copper(II), nickel(II) and cobalt(II) salts yields dinuclear co-ordination compounds, which were spectroscopically characterized. The crystal and molecular structure of one of the compounds, bis[µ-3,5-diacetylamino-1,2,4-triazolato-O′,N 1,N 2,O″]bis[(nitrato)(aqua)copper(II)] 1, was determined by single-crystal X-ray diffraction. Complex 1 consists of dinuclear units with an inversion center at the midpoint of the Cu–Cu vector. The most remarkable feature of this structure is that the daat ligand forms a six-membered chelate ring [Cu–N3–C3–N1–C2–O1; Cua–N4–C4–N5–C5–O2], in contrast with the five-membered chelate rings always found in comparable triazole derived dimers. This structural feature is studied in the context of the geometry of the bridging system. Variable-temperature ESR spectral and magnetic susceptibility data indicate antiferromagnetic behaviour. The magnetic susceptibility data (4–290 K) are interpreted using the spin Hamiltonian Ĥ = –2J(ŜCu1·ŜCu2), and yielded J = –36 cm–1 and g = 2.13. The magnitude of the exchange interaction is compared with previously reported magnetostructural data for related double 1,2,4-triazole-N1,N2 bridged dinuclear copper(II) compounds. A correlation between the exchange parameter J and the N–Cu–N angle is described. Variable-temperature magnetic susceptibility measurements (2–300 K) for the Ni(II) and Co(II) analogous compounds confirmed the dimeric nature of these compounds and showed the presence of antiferromagnetic exchange; the corresponding J values are rationalized on the basis of the structural features of the isostructural Cu(II) compound 1.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ferrer et al. (1999) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: