Authors
Protocols are everywhere, once you start looking! Most protocols are unique, but share many qualities that allow us to create taxonomies. Consider these important ways to characterize protocols (see Safe New World) found in the wild: structure: social ↔ material scale: atomic ↔ systemic failure mode: Kafka- or Bartleby-type (see Kafka Index) lifecycle: budding, juvenile, mature, dead With these dimensions, it becomes easier to isolate and identify protocols in the wild. You can document common varieties and even assemble an evolutionary tree. To add some fun, the same protocol can be spotted in different stages of its lifecycle or in a failure mode…
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bucher et al. (1975) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 4 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: