New complexes of the types [RuX2(CO)L3], [RuXY(CO)L3], [RuX2(CO)2L2], and [Ru2X3L6][anion](X = Cl, Br, or I; Y = H, Cl, Br, I, NO3, acetate, propionate, or benzoate; L = PR3 or AsR3) are described. The hydrido-complexes [RuHX(CO)(PR3)3], configuration (III), react with nitric acid or carboxylic acids to give complexes of the type [RuXY(CO)(PR3)3](Y = NO3 or carboxylate) but with halogen acids (HY) mixtures are formed. An arsine hydrido-complex [RuHCl(CO)(AsMe2Ph)3] is described. The ruthenium–chlorine stretching frequencies for these complexes are recorded and discussed. Tertiary phosphines cause much weakening of a ruthenium–chlorine bond in trans-position, and carbon monoxide is a poorly trans-bond weakening ligand but causes more weakening than chlorine as trans-ligand. These bond-weakening effects are discussed. There is good correlation between a low ruthenium–chlorine stretching frequency and a high lability of the chlorine towards nucleophilic displacement; inert chlorines show high ruthenium–chlorine stretching frequencies. The stepwise formation of [RulCl(CO)(PMe2Ph)3] and [Rul2(CO)(PMe2Ph)3] from [RuCl2(CO)(PMe2Ph)3], configuration (II) by nucleophilic displacement of chloride by iodide, has been followed by an n.m.r. method. N.m.r. data and values for νCO are given.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lupin et al. (1968) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: