This is the authors' abstract. We don't add key points for this paper.
The formation of thorium metallacyclopentadiene and metallacyclopropene complexes is significantly influenced by the steric and electronic properties of the internal alkyne employed during their syntheses. The reduction of (η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ) 2 ThCl 2 ( 2 ) with potassium graphite (KC 8 ) or lithium in the presence of internal phenyl(alkyl)acetylenes (PhC≡CR) selectively yields the corresponding C s -symmetric thorium metallacyclopentadienes (η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Th[η 2 -C(Ph)═C(R)C(Ph)═C(R)] (R = Me ( 4 ), i Pr ( 5 ), C 6 H 11 ( 6 )), while the phenyl(silyl)acetylene PhC≡CSiHMe 2 gives the C 2 v -symmetric metallacyclopentadiene (η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Th[η 2 -C(SiHMe 2 )═C(Ph)C(Ph)═C(SiHMe 2 )] ( 7 ). However, the sterically more encumbered acetylene derivative PhC≡CSiMe 3 affords the chloro metallacyclopropene complex [(η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Th(η 2 -C 2 Ph(SiMe 3 ))(Cl)][Li(EDM) 2 ] ( 8 ), whereas Me 3 SiC≡CSiMe 3 forms the chloro alkenyl complex [(η 5 -C 5 Me 5 ) 2 Th[C(SiMe 3 )═CHSiMe 3 ](Cl) ( 9 ), in which the chloro metallacyclopropene intermolecularly activates a C–H bond of the solvent (C 7 H 8 ). Density functional theory (DFT) studies complement the experimental findings and rationalize the selectivity observed in the C–C bond formation.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: