Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We report a series of 3d-4f complexes {Ln2 Cu3 (H3 L)2 Xn } (X=OAc(-) , Ln=Gd, Tb or X=NO3 (-) , Ln=Gd, Tb, Dy, Ho, Er) using the 2,2'-(propane-1,3-diyldiimino)bis[2-(hydroxylmethyl)propane-1,3-diol] (H6 L) pro-ligand. All complexes, except that in which Ln=Gd, show slow magnetic relaxation in zero applied dc field. A remarkable improvement of the energy barrier to reorientation of the magnetisation in the {Tb2 Cu3 (H3 L)2 Xn } complexes is seen by changing the auxiliary ligands (X=OAc(-) for NO3 (-) ). This leads to the largest reported relaxation barrier in zero applied dc field for a Tb/Cu-based single-molecule magnet. Ab initio CASSCF calculations performed on mononuclear Tb(III) models are employed to understand the increase in energy barrier and the calculations suggest that the difference stems from a change in the Tb(III) coordination environment (C4v versus Cs ).
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ojea et al. (2016) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: