Key result
Long-term durability of endografts for abdominal aortic aneurysms remains an issue, with limited follow-up data beyond 3 to 4 years showing gradually accumulating device failures.
This review highlights that long-term durability of AAA endografts remains a concern, emphasizing the need for extended follow-up and continuous device improvement.
May necessitate lifelong post-EVAR surveillance; leaves open durability of newer devices for prospective study.
-Since their introduction in 1991, endografts for the exclusion of abdominal aortic aneurysms have evolved by "learning from failures." As significant device failure modes are reported, manufacturers modify device design to improve effectiveness and durability based on analysis of clinical results. This article summarizes what has been learned from a variety of device failures with a view toward understanding the implications for future activity in the continuing development of endovascular technology. Secondary interventions have been used to improve late outcomes of many devices. Long-term durability remains an issue because the limited data on follow-up beyond 3 or 4 years show gradually accumulating device failures in ways that were not anticipated. The future of successful endografting requires more and longer-term follow-up data, better understanding of the interaction between aortoiliac morphology and device design, improved imaging techniques, development of physiologic methods for endograft assessment, investigation of adjunctive measures to control the abdominal aortic aneurysm (AAA) sac environment, and expansion of the dialogue between clinicians and industry. KEYWORD Abdominal aortic aneurysm - endograft failure - stent-graft durability
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hugh G. Beebe (2001) conducted a review in Abdominal aortic aneurysm. Endografts was evaluated. Long-term durability of endografts for abdominal aortic aneurysms remains an issue, with limited follow-up data beyond 3 to 4 years showing gradually accumulating device failures.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: