Key result
Laparoscopic mini gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy produced comparable reductions in total cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides at 6 months in 24 morbidly obese patients with dyslipidemia.
Why the study?
To compare the effects of laparoscopic mini gastric bypass versus sleeve gastrectomy on total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and triglycerides in obese patients.
Does Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass improve lipid profiles compared to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in morbidly obese individuals with dyslipidemia?
Cohort (n=24)
Does Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass improve lipid profiles compared to Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy in morbidly obese individuals with dyslipidemia?
Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass may offer superior improvements in specific lipid parameters compared to sleeve gastrectomy in morbidly obese patients with dyslipidemia.
Small observational study of MGB versus sleeve on lipids in 24 patients; leaves open comparative effects on cholesterol and triglycerides.
Background: Only bariatric surgery has been demonstrated to produce sustained weight loss and alleviation of obesity-related health complications. Named laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy and Mini Gastric Bypass. Objectives: to assess the effects of the two surgical procedure of bariatric surgery, MGB & sleeve gastrectomy, on total cholesterol (HDL-LDL) and TG, and to compare the findings among the two groups. Patients and Methods: This research was performed on twenty four morbidly obese individuals with dyslipidemia. This includes twelve cases that underwent MGB Group one and twelve cases Group two underwent sleeve gastrectomy ,The anthropometric data and lipid profile of patients were evaluated preoperatively and six months postoperatively. Results: Preoperative baseline anthropometric, lipid profile measurements revealed no difference among the two groups statistically, There was no statistical difference among the two groups in total cholesterol and HDL levels but there was statistical difference among the two groups in LDL and TG levels, Six months after surgery, anthropometric measurements showed no statistical variation .There was no statistical variance in total cholesterol and HDL levels among the two groups six months after surgery, but there was a considerable statistical variance in LDL and triglyceride levels. Conclusion: both laparoscopic procedures, LSG and MGB, are equally successful in producing substantial weight reduction and improvement the medical complications linked to obesity.Even so, LMGB may be the better choice for people with dyslipidemia. Total cholesterol LDL cholesterol, and triglyceride reductions are comparable to LSG, whereas HDL rise is more pronounced in LMGB.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Elmohr et al. (2023) conducted a cohort in Morbid obesity with dyslipidemia (n=24). Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass (LMGB) vs. Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy (LSG) was evaluated on Lipid profile (total cholesterol, HDL, LDL, and triglycerides). Laparoscopic mini gastric bypass and sleeve gastrectomy produced comparable reductions in total cholesterol, LDL, and triglycerides at 6 months in 24 morbidly obese patients with dyslipidemia.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: