Key result
Sensory recall occurred in 15.6% of patients receiving spinal anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty compared to 0% of those receiving general anesthesia, with decreasing age and lower midazolam doses identified as significant risk factors.
Why the study?
Recall of auditory and physical sensations during hip and knee arthroplasty surgery is inadequately studied.
Observational (n=164)
No
Sensory recall occurs in 14% of patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty, primarily associated with spinal anesthesia, younger age, and lower midazolam doses, though it has minimal effect on overall patient satisfaction.
Sensory recall in 14% of neuraxial cases minimally affects satisfaction; leaves open whether sedation adjustments warrant prospective trials.
Introduction Recall of auditory and physical sensations during hip and knee arthroplasty surgery is inadequately studied. We investigated rates of sensory recall, impact on satisfaction, and risk factors. Methods We surveyed 164 consecutive patients after primary or revision arthroplasty about sensory recall and its impact on satisfaction (improved, worsened, or no effect), without exclusions. Three surgeons and 25 anesthesiologists in an academic university hospital setting provided care. Demographic data (age, gender, BMI, comorbidities, ASA class), type of anesthesia, intravenous fentanyl and midazolam doses, pre-operative diagnosis, type of surgery, anesthesia duration, and surgery time (morning vs afternoon case) were analyzed. Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated for each variable. A binary logistic regression model was used to identify risk factors for sensory recall. Results 147 patients (89.6%) received spinal anesthesia. No patients receiving general anesthesia had recall. Twenty-three patients (14.0% of the total, 15.6% of neuraxial anesthesia patients) had sensory recall after surgery: 19 (11.6%) auditory, 2 (1.2%) physical, and 2 (1.2%) both. There was a correlation between spinal anesthesia and sensory recall, r = 0.163, p = 0.037. On logistic regression, decreasing age (p=0.032, 95% CI, 0.894–0.995) and less midazolam (p = 0.009, 95% CI, 0.283–0.832) were significant risk factors for sensory recall. Seventeen (73.9%) reported no impact on satisfaction (14 auditory, 2 physical, 1 both), while two (8.7%) reported worse satisfaction (1 auditory, 1 both) and four (17.4%) reported improved satisfaction (all auditory). Conclusion We found a 14.0% rate of sensory recall. Spinal anesthesia, decreasing age, and lower benzodiazepine administration were associated with sensory recall. Sensory recall has a minimal effect on patient satisfaction, although some were still affected. Although we focused on instrument sounds, our high rate of sensory recall serves as a reminder to also be mindful of conversations in the operating room.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Weiner et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Total joint arthroplasty (n=164). Spinal anesthesia vs. General anesthesia was evaluated on Incidence of sensory recall during surgery (r = 0.163, p=0.037). Sensory recall occurred in 15.6% of patients receiving spinal anesthesia for total joint arthroplasty compared to 0% of those receiving general anesthesia, with decreasing age and lower midazolam doses identified as significant risk factors.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: